It’s Going to Be Okay – Follow Up

On Tuesday night, after tossing and turning for a couple hours, I said fuck it and grabbed the laptop and started typing. What came out was a post called It’s Going to Be Okay. The next day, the post was read by over a million people.

The reactions were intense, and most of what I heard boiled down to one of these two things:

1) This made me feel better.

2) You got this really wrong.

For the people who reacted the first way, the post felt like a reminder of the big picture—the fact that America was built to survive a guy like Trump, no matter what he has in mind for the next four years, and the fact that the nasty parts of Trump, his campaign, and his constituency are only one part of the story here.

The people in the second category thought I was painting much too rosy a picture. Some people pointed out that as a white cis heterosexual male, I far too easily brushed off the fears that many other people are currently feeling. Others were livid that I seemed to approve of Trump’s choice of Pence as a running mate. And some couldn’t believe that I failed to mention the environmental impact of the election at all.

My main feeling as I read through all the reactions was, “This is why Wait But Why posts should take at least a week to write.”

A long post created over a bunch of days allows for me to paint a complete picture of what I think and work through a topic with all the nuance it warrants. A short post, typed out quickly and emotionally at 4am, without the usual many hours of deep thought and rigorous outlining and careful wording, does not.

The result was an imperfect post that I think failed in some ways and succeeded in others. Over the past three days, like many of you, I’ve read a bunch of articles about the situation, talked to a lot of people about it, and done a lot more thinking. It’s been an emotional rollercoaster. Here are some things I’ve been thinking:

1) God I wish Hillary Clinton were the president-elect.

Or Bernie Sanders. Or Marco Rubio. Or Jeb Bush. Or John Kasich. Or literally any normal fucking politician.

2) In trying to focus on what I felt was an optimistic long-term outlook, I totally under-acknowledged the way a ton of Americans feel right now. 

Some of the most hateful parts of our society—which over recent decades have been increasingly relegated to the fringes—have been made to feel a lot less fringe by the election of a man who has spent the last year validating their beliefs and nodding towards them with a wink. Hateful behavior being thought of as shameful and taboo is a big part of what prevents it from happening, and when the president signals that he’s not ashamed to think and speak in that way, it quickly normalizes the behavior in many people’s minds. This reality was articulated well in many blog comments, and in an email I received from my friend Billy Wheelan in response to my post:

When some guy yelled out “hang Obama!” during Trump’s acceptance speech, I wasn’t the only one who heard it. When my friend posted on Facebook that after not enduring it since the age of 11 he was called a faggot two separate times today walking in his neighborhood, he wasn’t misremembering his day. Muslims and trans kids aren’t bugging for no reason. They are reacting rationally given the context of their life experiences to a set of stimuli that isn’t affecting you the same way it’s affecting them. 

This is a disturbing and scary time for many people to be in America. My one paragraph about this topic—which was focused on the long-term outlook—carelessly glossed over the current state of things. I’m sorry.

3) Three days after writing my post, this sentence—”I’d predict that President Trump is all about surrounding himself with experts who know very well how to run the executive branch”—is looking pretty not accurate. 

It’s too early to know what Trump’s eventual cabinet will look like, but early reports have me looking at news headlines and saying, “What the FUCK.” Trump is an extreme ends-justify-the-means guy—even for a politician—and what makes that most unsettling is we don’t really seem to know what his ends are. It’s not even clear that he knows what his ends are. Crossing my fingers that I’ll look back on this and see that I was overreacting.

4) I still think this country is ready for a female president.

But the term I used—unbelievably ready—may have been a little much. I think we’re ready for a female president to the extent that we’re ready for a black president. Obama definitely lost a good number of votes in 2008 and 2012 because of his race, and Clinton definitely lost a good number of votes this election because she’s a woman. In 2016, being a woman adds in a hurdle that’s not there for men—I just don’t think the hurdle is insurmountable. Some people argued that if Hillary were a man, she would have won. Perhaps. But I’d also continue to argue that if she had Michelle Obama’s personality, and/or fewer scandals in her past, she’d probably have won as well.

5) I still think we shouldn’t group all Trump voters together and demonize them all as horrible people. 

Here’s why I don’t think it’s really fair to call all Trump voters hateful people, just because Trump ran a hateful campaign:

Imagine an election between Ted Cruz and a charismatic Democrat in a year when a Republican had been in office for the past eight years. Now imagine that the Democrat has this awkward quality where he often says horrible, disparaging things about religion and evangelical Christians in particular. Can’t you imagine a bunch of staunch Democrats voting for him despite wishing he weren’t so nasty about religious people? They’d justify it because A) a Ted Cruz presidency sounds like a nightmare to him, especially knowing that he’d nominate ultra-conservative justices and do his best to overturn abortion laws, B) they’re not religious and don’t know any super-religious people, so they’re not as sensitive to the vocal criticism of evangelical Christians as others might be, and C) they’re feeling scared and just really badly want a Democrat in office. Would they feel guilty about voting for kind of a nasty candidate? Probably. Would many of them vote for him anyway? Probably. Would that make those voters hateful people? Not really.

I know these situations aren’t perfectly analogous—I’m making the point that voting for a candidate does not imply that you espouse all of his or her views. People often hate some of a candidate’s views and still find reason to grit their teeth and cast their vote. A little over 60 million Americans voted for Trump—or about 19% of the country. While a good contingent of those are definitely what Hillary called deplorables, I’d imagine that a bunch of the Trump voters are simply conservative Republicans who care deeply about Supreme Court appointments and hate high taxes and are feeling scared and frustrated and just really wanted a Republican in office—and they felt strongly enough about it to vote for Trump, despite being uncomfortable with the man he is and the way he campaigned. This isn’t letting them off the hook for the consequences of their vote—only saying that it’s probably not correct that all Trump voters are hateful people.

6) Some of what liberals are upset about was inevitable.

Putting Trump himself aside for a second—politically, what I saw Tuesday night is an inevitable shift of tide. In American politics, the party zig-zag is one of the most reliable patterns you can find. Over the last century, one political party has maintained power for over 12 years straight exactly once—the 20 years Democrats were in power between 1932 and 1952—and that was a time of exceptional circumstances because of World War II. It’s been a full zig-zag.

zig-zag-presidents

This makes sense. In any given year, most people in a country feel like they want a better life, so once one party has been in power for a while, it’s a layup for the other party to run for office successfully on a platform that essentially says, “If you’re satisfied with your life how it is, continue voting for the party that’s been in power—if you’d like a better life, vote for us.” Further, when one party is in power for an extended period of time, citizens of the other party begin to feel increasingly frustrated, desperate, and disenfranchised—which translates to increasing political support for the party out of power, while successive wins for the party in power leaves those voters increasingly complacent and overconfident.

Liberals are upset about a lot of things right now, but a large number of them simply amount to the fact that the Republican Party has inevitably regained control of the government. People’s horror over what will now happen with the Supreme Court, climate change policies, and the gutting of Obamacare, for example, would be no different if a far less offensive Republican—say, Marco Rubio—had won the presidency. And history tells us that if the Republicans hadn’t taken over this year, they probably would have four years from now. So a blow to the liberal agenda in all these areas was predictable. These various causes were never going to simply remain on a steady progressive path—not in this country.

That doesn’t mean liberals shouldn’t be upset about having their most important causes in jeopardy. It just reinforces the fact that if you don’t think you can convince voters of the other party to agree with you about an issue, then government policies regarding that issue will only be on your side half the time—and you should focus on solving the problem outside of government, if at all possible.

7) When I feel long-term optimistic, it’s because I’m thinking about my graphs from this post

In the post, I talked about how humans are normally on what I called Step 1 of consciousness—and how it should be our goal to try as much as possible to see things from Step 2, a place with a higher vantage point that provides a more zoomed-out view. Then I compared how good and bad events look from those two steps:

Something good happening:

good-thing

Something bad happening:

bad-thing

8) Nahhhhhhhhh.Nahhhhhhhhh meaning nahhhhhhhhh I don’t want that to happen, not nahhhhhhhhh that won’t happen.

_______

If you like Wait But Why, sign up for our email list and we’ll send you new posts when they come out.

To support Wait But Why, visit our Patreon page.

Read this next

20 comments

Leave a Reply

  1. Personalize Link Avatar

    “Your motivational messages are like a compass guiding me through the rough seas of life. Thank you for the direction!”

  2. George Hegedus Avatar
    George Hegedus
    Hide

    Hoping for an update soon, especially after this 6th of January.

  3. L Haviland Avatar
    L Haviland
    Hide

    Wowie McZowie has this one aged poorly.

  4. Joel Comino Avatar
    Joel Comino
    Hide

    I hereby dub thee: Sir Cavey McCaverson

  5. Goussu Mgoussu Avatar
    Goussu Mgoussu
    Hide

    So you went from “Let’s try to write post in one day” and all the backlash of your “everything is going to be ok” post. To let’s wait three years and post a full history of the united states of america. Not a half hearted man.

    Two major questions :

    1) how did you earn money/make a living during this time ?

    2) why the hell is the third blue rectangle in the FDR/Trumann suit not aligned with the others ? Do you intend to hurt people with OCD ? 😉

  6. saymwah Avatar
    saymwah
    Hide

    I hope at this point all reasonable people can agree that his presidency has been an unqualified broad-spectrum disaster unless you are rich, white, and old enough to not give a crap about the future. The 38% who will never agree because they continue to poison themselves with right-wing propaganda don’t count as reasonable.

    1. CS Avatar
      CS
      Hide

      You missed a huge part of Tim’s point, which is that you cannot just call 50% of your population racist and unreasonable. Trump has been a disaster in many ways, but from the view of half the population, he has not been as big of a disaster (or at least not a greater disaster) than Hilary would have been. It’s okay to have different opinions and viewpoints, but it’s not okay to demonize people on the other side of the fence with inaccurate, low-resolution assumptions – true discourse and the ability to compromise between the sides cannot exist in that format. I am not trying to sway your political views, but I hope you can learn to look at those who oppose your views with more understanding as a way to a better future, instead of aggressively trying to push them out of the scene. *Not old, not male, and most definitely not rich.

      1. saymwah Avatar
        saymwah
        Hide

        Believing that Hillary would have been a bigger disaster than Trump is most definitely an inaccurate, low-resolution assumption. Would she be denying climate change? Alienating our allies? Cozying up to dictators? Circumventing Congress? Doubling down on dividing the country and demonizing the people who don’t agree with her? Attacking the legitimacy of the media whenever she didn’t like what they said? etc. etc. etc. etc.

        In what possible reality-based way would Hillary have been a bigger disaster than Trump?

        1. Yeet Avatar
          Yeet
          Hide

          While I agree with you, that was not his main point. Don’t just argue for the sake of arguing.

        2. fotc1313 Avatar
          fotc1313
          Hide

          1. Climate Change? No she would continue throwing billions at the Paris Accord et al and paying everyone else’s shares while others pay nothing.
          2. Our Allies? Again, she would be paying more than the US’s fair share in most places; while running pay to plat schemes in others just to fill her own pockets.
          3. Cozying up to Dictators? You mean doing things like facilitating the sale of uranium to Russia for personal financial gain? Another big Reset with Putin?
          4. Circumventing Congress? Do I think she would sign 28 Executive Orders in her first two weeks? Then prob not since Obama just left, but now? Of course. Just like Biden proved. Dems aren’t interested in bi partisanship. Queen Hilary wouldn’t be either.
          5. Dividing & Demonizing? Depends on how you feel about being labelled as “A Deplorable”. Or being called a racist for wearing a red hat that reads what was originally a campaign slogan for Ronald Reagan (MAGA).
          6. The Media? Ha. Well first you’d need them to say something against her and/or the Democratic party, and anyone with half a brain knows that’s not going to happen. Look at the kid gloves ol Joe is treated with? Disgusting.
          —so there you have it, saymwah…Looks like your post aged about as well as the one you are commenting on/defending…
          Thats plenty of proof that HRC would’ve been a HUGE (silent “H”) Disaster. Peace.

  7. Mark Gunkel Avatar
    Mark Gunkel
    Hide

    time for a follow up…

  8. Chip Dodd Avatar
    Chip Dodd
    Hide

    There is one other huge constituency you failed to mention. There are many who prefer states rights and limited government, especially at the federal level. Regardless of how offensive he is to all of us, he did promise to be a wrecking ball to the govt. and he is living up to that promise. Our system is very flawed so tearing it down and rebuilding it better is a legitimate strategy reccommended by our forefathers. So, which candidate will strengthen the fed vs. which one will weaken it is a major determining factor.

    1. saymwah Avatar
      saymwah
      Hide

      He hasn’t rebuilt anything. In the past two and a half years all he’s done is make it blindingly obvious why we needed “the system” in the first place.

  9. nicky Avatar
    nicky
    Hide

    What does he do?
    – Deviding the West
    – Isolating the US
    – Deviding the US from within,
    Now frankly, whose agenda is that?

    1. fotc1313 Avatar
      fotc1313
      Hide

      He welcomes anyone that puts the needs of the United States over the rest of the World. Nothing wrong with that. Do you also have a problem with Peace in the Middle East? Apparently you prefer Biden getting back to massive bombings in foreign countries? Hypocrite.

      1. Yeet Avatar
        Yeet
        Hide

        You realize that argument is pointless right? I personally disagree with your side, but at this point neither side is willing to believe what the other says, so argument is an exercise in frustration and futility.