7.3 Billion People, One Building

After a year and a half of writing Wait But Why posts, I’ve noticed a theme: humans seem to come up a lot.

Sometimes we talk about where humans came from or where we might be going or how we’re all related; other times we look at how we interact and communicate and form relationships. We’ve talked about rich humans and famous humans and baby humans and dead humans and humans from all over the world. We’ve explored what it means to be a human, what it means to be a good human, and whether we’re all alone in the universe. And we’ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out what really matters most in this one, short human life.

But somehow, we made it through all of that discussion without ever asking the most important question of all about humans—

How big a building would you need to fit them all in it?

It’s a question that’s tantalized almost no one through the ages, and today we’re gonna tackle it hard.

But before we ask all 7.3 billion humans to stop what they’re doing so I can arrange and bunch them together at my whim, let’s discuss the number 7.3 billion.

The first thing to note is that when I did a post on population density in August of 2013, the number I kept referring to was 7.1 billion. The world population has grown by 194,000,000, or almost 3%, since then.

Second, 7.3 billion people is a lot of people. If each living human were represented by a dry grain of rice, the rice would fill a cube-shaped box with a side of 6.1 meters,There are about 7,000 grains of rice to a cup, or to 240mL, which translates to 7.3 billion grains filling 251 cubic meters. (In this post, gray square footnotes will be for calculations and other technical details. Blue circles for extraneous thoughts and facts.) or about 20 feet—around the size of a two-story house.

Rice

That’s a lot of rice grains.

And how about 7.3 billion grains of sand? Well according to this delightful chart, “sand” can mean a lot of things. 7.3 billion “very coarse” grains (about 2mm in diameter) would fill a large cubic room with a height of 4m (13ft). 7.3 billion medium-size grains (.25mm in diameter) would fill a medium, 46cm high (1.5ft) cardboard box. And 7.3 billion of the finest, .0625mm sand grains (any smaller and it wouldn’t be sand anymore—it would be silt) would take up about 1,700 cubic centimeters of space, almost but not quite filling a 2-liter soda bottle.

Also, walking 7.3 billion steps would take you around the Earth…150 times. (At two steps per second, that would take you 115 years.) (I’m doing that thing where I’m going on divergent math spirals during the post and then just putting what I figured out into the actual post. I’ll try to stay on topic here but it won’t be easy. Let’s keep going.)

7.3 billion humans in one-dimensional configurations

The first activity today will be putting all humans in a single file line. We’ll start near Quito, Ecuador, right on the equator, and the line will follow the equator. We’ll begin with Carlos. Stand here, Carlos.

Carlos

Second in line will be Daniela. Third is you, Andrea.According to this possibly-accurate list of popular Ecuadorian names, Carlos, Daniela, and Andrea are red hot right now. Since we’re trying to be efficient, I want everyone to stand as close as possible to the people in front of you and behind you without actually touching. Some people will require more or less space than others because people are different sizes, but let’s assume each person we add to the line will make the line one foot (about 30cm) longer on average.This metric system / non-metric system thing is unbelievably annoying. Almost half of WBW readers are from metric system countries, so I can’t just use imperial units, but a little over half of readers are from the US, so I can’t just use the metric system either, because feet and miles are a bit more intuitive to all those people. So I’ll just put calculations in both systems, which is annoying for everyone—because the US decided to stick with a totally nonsensical system of measurement.

Carlos and Others

So we do this for a while and the line gets longer and longer. We build bridges over oceans and tunnels through mountains to make a clean line along the equator. Eventually, the line goes around the whole Earth gets back to Carlos. But we’ve only gotten through 131 million people—less than 2% of humans—so we’ll need to wind around the Earth again. And again. Finally, halfway through the 56th loop, on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, we get to the final human, and we’re done.

Okay that kind of annoyed me because it ended up in the shape of spring, not a line. Let’s try another way.

Carlos, stand on the X again. We’re gonna have Daniela stand on your shoulders, and then Andrea’s gonna stand on hers, and we’ll just keep going up from there.

Tower

The average human is 165cm (5’5″) tall, but about a foot of that is from the shoulders to the top of the head, so when we add someone onto the top person’s shoulders, the height of the tower rises by an average of about 134cm (4’5″).

We stack and stack and eventually, we reach the moon. Unfortunately, we’ve only used 286 million people at this point and have 96% of humans still left to go. By the time we finally finish, the tower is 9.8 million km (6.1m miles) high, and we’re around 1/5th of the way to Mars, 1/4th of the way to Venus, and 1/15th of the way to the sun.At the closest they ever come to Earth, Mars is 33.9 million miles away, Venus is 24m miles away, and the sun is 93m miles away.

How about if we all held hands and formed a huge circle? Let’s say that we’ll stand side-by-side, holding hands, which is enough distance apart to take up about three feet (91cm) of the circle each.

3 Feet

Continuing like this, our final circle has a circumference of 6.6 million km (4.1m miles) and a diameter of 2.1 million km (1.3m miles).

Circle

While we’re all out there holding hands and dying instantly from being in space without suits, the Earth will look to us around the same size as the moon usually looks in our night sky.

Okay one dimensional shapes are pretty inconvenient for everyone—let’s reel things in and try this in two dimensions:

7.3 billion humans in two-dimensional configurations

The addition of a second dimension to our human shapes makes the species seem a lot smaller.

When arranging humans in two dimensions, the first question we need to ask is, “How much ground area does each human need when we’re bunching them all together as closely as we can without killing everyone?” The answer, for this post, is .1 square meters, giving us a rate of 10 people per square meter.

How Many People Can Fit in a Square Meter Comfortably-ish?

The quest for this answer brought me to the most obscure corners of the internet, where I came across two key groups of bored people. The first one shows nine Canadian journalists choosing to spend time positioning themselves together into one square meter. Doing so gives each of them an average of one 33cm x 33cm (13″ x 13″) square to stand in. You can see in the video that while it’s definitely tight, no one is forced to molest anyone else and everyone can breathe.

But that’s using all adults. The world’s median age is 29, and the youngest billion humans tend to be quite little. The second case brings us across the world to a random New Zealand elementary school, where a teacher has decided to get cute and cram as many kids as she can into a square meter. She maxes out at a shocking 22 kids.

Putting these two performances together, it seems reasonable to say that 10 humans per square meter is a safe estimate for what we can use as our human-bunching metric. Nine adults in the square managed fine and the addition of children into the mix should be able to easily increase that total by one to 10 (yes, some adults are much larger than average, but others are tiny—the world’s average adult is a not-that-large 62kg (137lb) person).

At 10 people per square meter, we can fit 1,000 people in a 10m x 10m square. A basketball court is 28m x 15m, which means we can fit 4,200 people on one, all in bounds.

We can fit 54,000 people on an American football field, which is large enough to hold the entire population of Liechtenstein or Monaco, and if we expand our field to the size of a soccer field—sorry, a football pitch—we can hold over 71,000 people, more than enough space to contain the population of Greenland.

Tiananmen Square is pretty huge—880m x 500m or just under half a square kilometer.

china-tiananmen-square-aerial
Credit: Keith Higgons

 If it were empty, it could hold 4.4 million people, or the entire population of Croatia, Oman, Lebanon, Panama, Moldova, Uruguay, Kuwait, Mongolia, or Lithuania.

A full square kilometer could fit 10 million people—the population of a megacity—and you could pack all 26 million Scandinavians—everyone in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and DenmarkThe definition of Scandinavia is a little confusing. Some people exclude Denmark or Finland, others include Iceland. The most common definition seems to be those four countries.—into one square mile.

scandinavia

Central Park, with an area of 3.41 square km (1.3 sq mi), could easily hold the population of Australia, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Peru, Venezuela, Malaysia, Nepal, Mozambique or Syria. You could fit all 13.9 million Jews into Central Park and still have room for the population of Romania, Chile, or the Netherlands. The entire human race in 5,000 BC, which historians estimate to be between 5 – 20 million people, would fill up at most a little over half of Central Park.

We’re just getting started, so settle in.

You could squeeze all 320 million Americans into a 5.7km x 5.7km (3.5mi x 3.5mi) square, which would take less than five hours to walk around.

Americans

And a square 10km x 10km (6.2mi x 6.2mi), or a small island about twice the size of Bermuda, could hold a billion people (which you could walk the perimeter of in about 8 hours). A slightly larger island, Martha’s Vineyard, has an area of 226km2 and could fit all the world’s Christians on it [insert your own wisecrack here]. Alternatively, Martha’s Vineyard could fit the entire combined population of North America and South America…and still have room for the entire population of Africa. As for the world’s females, if they ever got annoyed with men and wanted to start a club, they could hold their membership-wide meetings in the 360km2 Gaza Strip.

Anyway, what we really want to know is how big a piece of land we’d need to hold everyone—all 7.3 billion of us. And the answer is, a 27km x 27km (16.8mi x 16.8mi) square.

All Humans

That square is smaller than Bahrain. And on top of Africa, it would look like this:

Africa

The square is also smaller than New York City.

NYC has an area of 786 square km, or 303 sq mi, and the whole human race could fit inside it—with room for another half a billion people. Specifically:

  • Manhattan could fit 590 million people
  • Brooklyn could fit 1.38 billion people
  • Queens could fit 2.83 billion people
  • The Bronx could fit 1.09 billion people
  • Staten Island could fit 1.51 billion people

So let’s try it. First by geographic region:

NYC1

How’s everyone doing down there?

Crowd

Great. Now, let’s shift around and organize by religion:

NYC2

So that’s how much ground space the human race takes up—but that’s only talking about the living humans.

Scientists’ estimates for the total number of humans who have ever livedusing 50,000 BC as a starting date for humans. tend to range from 90 to 110 billion people. The most common estimates are around 108 billion total humans. Using that assumption, a little under 7% of all people who have ever lived are alive right now:

108B

We just had a Dinner Table discussion about which dead human we’d like to bring back to life—but what if we brought all dead humans back? How much space would we need to make room for them?

We’d need 10,800 square kilometers—a square with a side of 103km (65mi)—which would easily fit inside Jamaica, Qatar, Kuwait, The Gambia, or Connecticut.

Continuing into hypothetical world, we could fit a trillion people in South Korea, Iceland, Guatemala, or Cuba, and if we covered every square meter of the Earth’s land with people, it would fit 1.48 quadrillion people—200,000 times the current world population. To finish the job, let’s cover the entire surface of the Earth with people—including oceans—to bring the total people that could fit on an Earth-sized planet to a little over five quadrillion people.Not useful information.

And that’s all fine, but my grandfathers didn’t fight in World War II so I could write posts about two-dimensional things. Time to get in the ring with the big boys.

7.3 billion humans in three-dimensional configurations

Sticking with our 10 humans per square meter of floor metric, we bring height into the equation using the worldwide average human height of 165cm (65in).Super awkward to start this section with such a mundane sentence after rousing things up so much at the end of the last section. So we can build ourselves a booth with a square meter base and a 1.65 meter height that will fit 10 average humans. This gives us our 3D metric—.165m3/person, or 6.06 people per cubic meter.

When we put lots of people in three-dimensional buildings, we’ll do it by building different height “floors”—some floors would be higher than 1.65m for taller people, others would be shorter than average for shorter people, but each person would be on a floor where the ceiling was just a few millimeters above their head, and the floors would average out to be 1.65m high each.

The Empire State Building has a volume of 1.05 million cubic meters, which when hollowed out and replaced with our new “floors” would hold 6.3 million very unhappy people.

AT&T Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys, is a huge domed structure with a volume of 2.94 million cubic meters. With the addition of floors, it could hold 17.6 million people. That’s big enough to fit the entire population of Dallas…plus the populations of New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and Boston.

The largest building in the world, volume-wise, is the Boeing Everett Factory in Washington State. With a 900m x 495m base (which almost exactly matches the dimensions of Tiananmen Square) and a ceiling over 33m high, the factory’s volume is 13.3 million cubic meters—which we could fit all the world’s French people into with room left over for all the Belgians as well (78.7 million person capacity).

But if we’re gonna fit all of us into a single building, nothing currently on Earth is going to work—we have to build it ourselves.

At .165 meters per person, we’ll need a little over 1.2 billion cubic meters, or just over one cubic kilometer (1.204km3 to be exact).While I was at it, I worked out that to fit all 108 billion humans that have ever lived, we’d need a cubic building with sides of 2.6km. This cubic building would have a side of 1.07km (about 2/3 of a mile), giving it a base of about 1.1km—a little over double the size of the Boeing Factory base—and a height of 1,070m (3,511 feet), which is 29% taller than the Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest skyscraper. That’s a large building, but neither the base nor the height alone are unfathomable by modern architectural standards. Here’s what it would look like if we built it in Manhattan (with other structures added for reference):

Cube1

Cube2

Cube3

Somewhere in that building is you. Somewhere else are all your friends. Somewhere in there is a 16-year-old Cambodian girl and all her friends. Somewhere is a Somali pirate, his barber, and all his barber’s friends. Every NBA player is in there, along with every rockstar, movie star, supermodel, and politician. Every bartender and construction worker and priest and lawyer and prisoner and princess and soldier and dentist are somewhere in that building, along with all 1.4 billion Chinese people, every blond person, and every member of ISIS.

The human race, which seems overwhelmingly large in one dimension when it’s wrapping 55 times around the Earth or forming a circle that dwarfs the moon’s orbit, seems much more manageable when it can fit inside Bahrain or New York City with room to spare and almost quaint when organized neatly into a cube that would take you only 20 minutes to jog around.

And with that, our initial goal is accomplished. But what if, instead of ending this post here, we went just one step further? After all that work, who wants to stop now while there’s still so much empty space in all of our atoms?

7.3 Billion Humans Compressed Down to Their Atomic Nuclei

Every atom’s different, but a general ballpark rule is that an atom’s diameter is about 100,000 times larger than the diameter of its nucleus, the thing that carries nearly all of the atom’s mass. Translated into three dimensions, that means an atom’s nucleus makes up only around one quadrillionth of an atom’s total volume. The way I visualize this is by imagining an atom to be a cubic kilometer—a hollow cube taller than the tallest skyscraper (around the size of our humanity cube above). This building is so large that if you were inside it, hanging from the ceiling, and you let go, it would take you about 15 seconds of free fall before you hit the ground. If you’re standing on one side of the base, it would take you about 12 minutes to walk across to the other.

If that huge cube is an atom, somewhere in the middle is a 1 cm3 sugar cube—and that’s the nucleus. And the atom’s mass would be about exactly the mass of the sugar cube, which takes up one quadrillionth of the total space. Just about all of the other 999,999,999,999,999 quadrillionths of the atom is massless, empty space.

Your body’s mass is the combined masses of the sugar cubes in the middle of each of your body’s atoms.

So how big is the human race really? When we get rid of the empty space in all the atoms of all 7.3 billion people, what are we left with?

An M&M.

 

M&M

 

 

Not even, actually. The volume of a human is about .0664 cubic meters, putting the combined volume of all humans at about 485 million cubic meters. When we reduce that to one quadrillionth of its size, we get .485 cubic centimeters. An M&M is .636cm3, about 30% too large. A Skittle is too large too (.74cm3), as are a quarter (.809cm3) and a nickel (.689cm3). It’s pretty hard to find everyday objects as small as .485cm3 (a US penny works, but at .433cm3, falls just short of fitting us all in it).

And that’s where we’ll end things today. With an M&M weighing 450 million tonnes—heavier than 75 Pyramids of Giza—that we could all fit into if someone squished us hard enough.

___________

If you liked this post, here are four more posts in the Pointless Calculations category:

What Could You Buy With $241 Trillion? More cubes. Gold ones this time.

What Does a Quadrillion Sour Patch Kids Look Like? Candy cubes in space.

Putting the world’s oceans, lakes, and rivers in cubes. Water cubes.

What if all 7.1 Billion People Moved to Tunisia? No cubes, but another post experimenting with the human population (less abusive to the stick figures).

_______

If you like Wait But Why, sign up for our email list and we’ll send you new posts when they come out.

To support Wait But Why, visit our Patreon page.

Read this next

313 comments

Leave a Reply

  1. ninsophy Avatar
    ninsophy
    Hide

    I looked this up. Hot damn is this exactly my jam. signed up to the newsletter lol. Good work, good vibes!

  2. Wow_Who_Would_Think Avatar
    Wow_Who_Would_Think
    Hide

    The problem isn’t that there’s too many people in the world. The problem is that most people all want to live in the same few places. Also, big cities tend to have the most available jobs and so easier to stay employed.

  3. Carl Carlson Avatar
    Carl Carlson
    Hide

    I couldn’t finish reading this, the numbers are all wrong and illogical. I have been to carnivals, street feasts, concerts, etc and can confidently say you absolutely can not fit 10 million people into one square kilometer. The largest stadiums hold 100k people and are about half a square kilometer. So let’s say that realistically, if we use the feild and cram them into every broom closet that you can fit 500k into a 1 square kilometer space for a short period of time. That is a far cry from 10 million, and says nothing about what the living conditions would be, or how long it can be sustained.

  4. Liberty Dankmeme Avatar
    Liberty Dankmeme
    Hide

    did you ever figure out how long it would take to make the original iPhone from scratch if a witch disappeared all modern technology? asking for a friend

  5. Shoaiyb Sysa Avatar
    Shoaiyb Sysa
    Hide

    I never knew about this site until today. Love it 👍

  6. Emmanuel Goldstein Avatar
    Emmanuel Goldstein
    Hide

    Think of all the poo

  7. Lillit  Avatar
    Lillit
    Hide

    It is a interesting idea, that would reduce the kilometers by Cars and the streets could given Back to the nature. We would have more jungle. But not everybody likes to live in cities and there are also culturally valuable places. But lost and empty places should be renaturated.

  8. Gionei  Avatar
    Gionei
    Hide

    Please!How many people could fit in the cube-shaped city in the book Revelation 21:16. The city is laid out like a square; its length is as great as its breadth. And he measured the city with the reed: twelve thousand furlongs. Its length, breadth, and height are equal.” Revelation 21:16

  9. Lawrence  Avatar
    Lawrence
    Hide

    Why fit or move the Human. Just build a engine and a Sun to move the Earth and it own suns to keep the warmth and allowing for the trees to continue making oxygen and food plants.
    Using magnetic energy to pulse through space under central control of the Council. Experiments was already done growing food in space. Now we will be moving through space.

  10. joeyoungblood Avatar
    joeyoungblood
    Hide

    A future evil AI is gonna read this and get ideas

  11. Logan Avatar
    Logan
    Hide

    Elon papa please notice me, any way I would love to work for space x I’m 15 and I want to the best most ensured way to get a job anything in science would be amazing email me at Loganlang011@gmail.com https://media0.giphy.com/media/WAfGpVI1pI3e/giphy-downsized-small.mp4

  12. Heartland Patriot Avatar
    Heartland Patriot
    Hide

    The problem is NOT how many people there are on Earth at the moment. The problem is how many people are packed into relatively small areas. There are still HUGE swaths of this world where it is fairly empty, and I’m not talking about the polar areas, or deserts, either. So many have never been anywhere but the city they live in, and cannot comprehend how much empty space this Earth has.

  13. Georg Puchta Avatar
    Georg Puchta
    Hide

    It would be great if you could compare and contrast resource consumption per human say 1000 years ago, now and estimated 50 years from now (I know this would be quit a complex topic). The goal would be to put into perspective how big of a problem individual environmental issue really are in the context of what we will be able to address now or soon.

  14. MICHAEL Avatar
    MICHAEL
    Hide

    Is there a place in this where you estimate the average land space required by humans and compare that to available space so we know if the earth is over populated as the elites believe?

  15. Innoh Bos Mosetih Avatar
    Innoh Bos Mosetih
    Hide

    Elon sent me here

  16. James Avatar
    James
    Hide

    I knew about this from Elon.

  17. FunnyDude Avatar
    FunnyDude
    Hide

    Yes, but think about the amount of poop that cube could generate.

  18. Rupali Gurav Avatar
    Rupali Gurav
    Hide

    Robot have no feeling, no sensation.
    They don’t cry.
    They don’t Laugh. Their mind become like stone. Don’t eat, don’t drink.

  19. Damn Skippy Avatar
    Damn Skippy
    Hide

    There is room enough for everyone, if we all get along!
    Elon reposted 5-25-24, that’s why I am here!

    https://media1.giphy.com/media/v65rDtklV9l6g/giphy-downsized-small.mp4

    1. Larry Avatar
      Larry
      Hide

      Nice post, Skippy.

  20. Rupali Gurav Avatar
    Rupali Gurav
    Hide

    Nice Study and observation. We can complete everything. We have to come together and make team who can identify everything sortout situation.

  21. MoonshineSA Avatar
    MoonshineSA
    Hide

    After reading all the calculations I wondered how long all those humans would happily remain in their cube if one of them had been eating sugar beans. I’m sure they would all have dispersed back to where the stayed before.

  22. Rupali Gurav Avatar
    Rupali Gurav
    Hide

    ok

  23. givemethemic Avatar
    givemethemic
    Hide

    and then there’s reality.

  24. Jahus Avatar
    Jahus
    Hide

    Muslims and Jews shoulder to shoulder. That’ll be a nice show!

  25. Mimmo Limmo Avatar
    Hide

    Still I think we r too many in some places (Belgium, Italy) especially considering that private propriety is without limits☺️

  26. Omar Avatar
    Omar
    Hide

    I know what this post points to!

    It’s about the hollow earth.

    Everyone who doesn’t see anything good about this hypothetical world, actually it’s really world under your feet and if you have seen it, you would accept the idea , not only that you will fight to be there.
    It is Adam’s Paradise our Father the first human on this Earth. By the way, we are going all there soon Inshallah. See you there but before that there’s something will happen, keep watching and be a good human.

    1. Omar Avatar
      Omar
      Hide

      The God Allah is the one who has the permission to let us enter there, there is a lot Bliss and well-being life.

      Remember, the good people will be allowed to go there soon to spend the rest of their lives there. See you there.

  27. Adi Chiru Avatar
    Adi Chiru
    Hide

    Fun stuff but in reality a human lives in close connection with a number of people, household and their basic needs take some space. I would like to see that calculation, how many people can the earth on it’s configuration of land, water, forest, etc. support properly, while they can have a decent life. Otherwise all this is just some fun stuff

  28. Cheryl Turner Avatar
    Cheryl Turner
    Hide

    Who really knows the population, they probably lied to us about that.

  29. Ravi Toshniwal Avatar
    Ravi Toshniwal
    Hide

    It makes sense to me to do all this Math for a purpose!
    Maybe that purpose could be to save as many souls as we can in the event of a nuclear war. A sort of plan B . Sounds more practical to me then colonizing Mars.
    Of course it means safe radiation free zonal locations all over the planet.
    Why cramp everyone and not distribute in smaller protected shells?

  30. Thunderstorm | Badrae Avatar
    Thunderstorm | Badrae
    Hide

    What a very intellectual assay.

  31. kneadles Avatar
    kneadles
    Hide

    Who farted?

    1. Thunderstorm | Badrae Avatar
      Thunderstorm | Badrae
      Hide

      I didn’t

  32. Carl Hoopingarner Avatar

    I’m appalled you put us on Staten Island, lol.

    1. Harry Tapp Avatar
      Harry Tapp
      Hide

      Sounds pretty accurate to me since that is where you theoretically live now anyway.

  33. Crypto Momo Avatar
    Crypto Momo
    Hide

    Wow!!!! ????????????

  34. Odinson Avatar
    Odinson
    Hide

    People need room to breathe!

  35. Pete Avatar
    Pete
    Hide

    They only truth I care to know, is that the entire universe exists in my mind, and it’s not what anyone thinks they know or is told to believe. However, like all of us, being human, on this planet is far more engaging and beautiful when you get out there and simply experience love and kindness between others, rather than getting shoved in a random box in Manhatten. I truly know nothing about this planet or anything else, only what I’ve been told. It matters none though, I care not to exist in my head, but rather my heart, and in doing so, I can connect in a manner that gives an undeniable dimension of existence I call the soul.

    1. Aileen K. Douglas Avatar
      Aileen K. Douglas
      Hide

      This is the way hugs;-)

  36. Errabih Avatar
    Hide

    https://errabih.com

  37. Rob Larrikin Avatar
    Hide

    Humans are very small, and most of the earth’s surface is wilderness. I explained just how unaware of us the planet is, here: https://www.leftyliars.com/going-green-is-a-lie-and-a-myth/
    I said there that if you shrank the planet down to a sphere 2.4 meters (7’10.5”) wide, it would fit into your living room, from floor to ceiling.

    “If you placed your nose right up to the sphere, you would not be able to see humans on its surface, even with a powerful optical microscope. On that scale, humans would be .32 microns tall, which is a little bigger than a virus, or about 6.2 times smaller than an E. coli bacterium. See the math for this here. The Earth’s vegetation would be a faint coloration. It would be like crouching on the top of Australia’s Ayers Rock in the wet season and looking at a greenish tint on its surface.”

    1. Goldarcie Dreamule Avatar
      Goldarcie Dreamule
      Hide

      And it can only take a few hundred of a certain virus to kill a human or even something bigger.

  38. HyperSpace Trucker Avatar
    HyperSpace Trucker
    Hide

    Can still not fit your mom in there

  39. 108long Avatar
    108long
    Hide

    This article is fos. It leads the reader to envision all of humanity standing in NYC as it is today, when the only way any more than 100M or so would fit in NYC is if it was barren land with every square foot available for holding a person. Nobody thinks of NYC in those terms, thus the article gives a false impression of the statement.

  40. Arman Armani Avatar
    Arman Armani
    Hide

    How possible the cube? Is he assuming 7 people fit in each 1 cubic meters? 1 km cubic = 1 billion cubic m. It doesnt make sense. It must be at least 14 more cubes assuming each person fit into 2 cubic meters. I dont think this calcualtion is correct.

  41. Andy Norman Avatar
    Andy Norman
    Hide

    Trust Reddit to argue endlessly about the assumptions…

    https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/w2ozl6/comment/igrcdu7/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

  42. Emily George Avatar
    Emily George
    Hide

    If everyone was squashed into an m&m, would the mass and therefore density be enough to create a black hole?

    1. ralf Avatar
      ralf
      Hide

      No. Not enough mass. It would just be a very small neutron star.
      If i remember right it would require the mass of 1.4 of our suns to crest a black whole.

  43. sylledylle Avatar
    sylledylle
    Hide

    Really good post 🙂

  44. Some Random Guy Avatar
    Some Random Guy
    Hide

    good post

  45. Addie Avatar
    Addie
    Hide

    Who votes that everyone in the world gets to their nearest airport one day and flies to a 729 square km field somewhere and stand as close as we can to each other, just so we can see this in real life…

    1. Cheryl Turner Avatar
      Cheryl Turner
      Hide

      Can we leave out people like Bill Gates and Trudeau

  46. Lemonade4294 Avatar
    Lemonade4294
    Hide

    I guess I’m in a big cube with everyone in the world now.

    Or maybe I’m in an M&M. I don’t know.

  47. Jerry Avatar
    Jerry
    Hide

    Hmmm… a great way to spread coronavirus

  48. Tushar Saxena Avatar

    Elon sent me here

    1. Sree Gopalan Avatar
      Sree Gopalan
      Hide

      me too…????

    2. False Progress Avatar

      That was one of Musk’s worst overpopulation-denial tweets (or Xs), linking to a site that shows number-crunching of human body dimensions with no context of Man’s huge resource footprint on land & sea, energy use, habitat destruction and all the rest. His excuse for Starlink satellite sprawl is equally simpleminded: “Space is big.”

      Would he say that a home’s foundation is fine because all its termites could fit inside some Tupperware? No concern for what large populations actually DO. They don’t just sit still in tight confinement, consuming nothing.

      He constantly tweets that America is too full of people to handle more net immigration (on that I agree) which directly contradicts his underpopulation claims. That’s the sign of a mind not running on all battery cells.

  49. Carlos Duran Avatar
    Carlos Duran
    Hide

    Hey I’m Carlos!

    1. Caleb Birtwistle Avatar
      Caleb Birtwistle
      Hide

      yes

  50. Paul Buder Avatar
    Paul Buder
    Hide

    I know it’s all just to give a general idea, but there is no way if you draw a meter square on the floor that you are going to get 10 people standing within that square no matter how hard you push.

    1. Wayne Keith Avatar
      Wayne Keith
      Hide

      I think 6 or 7 normal sized people might be a better estimate, but on the other hand I’ve seen some pretty large people around my neighborhood and it would be quite a feat to fit 2 of them into that same space

  51. Henry Zhou Avatar
    Henry Zhou
    Hide

    cool writeup, can you also do all living animals too? 🙂

  52. Louis E. Avatar
    Louis E.
    Hide

    How about a building that every human (including the close to 500 million added since this article was written) could actually live in,as opposed to be squeezed into for a photo op and then starve?

    1. Sammy Avatar
      Sammy
      Hide

      That’s kinda what I meant when I put my search into Google and this came up, yeah…
      Still cool article though!

  53. Roy Long Avatar
    Roy Long
    Hide

    haha if 7.3 billion people were in a building there goes six feet social distancing 🙂

  54. Karol Avatar
    Hide

    Nice. 🙂

  55. Drakamos Avatar
    Drakamos
    Hide

    this is as cool as it is terrifying. I started laughing (either in shock and possibly terror I’m not sure) upon realizing the scope of the m&m

  56. informatimago Avatar
    informatimago
    Hide

    We’d want a more realistic calculation, using the space needed to support all human beings alive with all the supporting ecosystem; I would guess that the building size would still be small enough that we could envision building a space ship capable of bringing the whole humanity to another planet.

    1. Willeen Olivier Avatar
      Willeen Olivier
      Hide

      Not if you look at all the supporting ecosystems. Food is not that big an issue, depending on what you want to eat of course, however I don’t think we even have an idea of the needs for maintaining the carbon / oxygen balance, and you might want to also read up on water catchments, and what it would take to produce enough fresh water over time. Not even the death star would be big enough!

  57. Mark P Warkentin Avatar
    Mark P Warkentin
    Hide

    I am single and live in a 524 square foot apartment (round down to 500). Interested if each person had the same space, how large would the total space be required be for 7.3 billion people?
    Or, how much living space would be needed for 1200 people to live in a “generation spaceship”. Assuming that would be the number of genetic variations needed to populate a new planet?

    1. Nico Avatar
      Nico
      Hide

      7.3 billion people, each with 500 square feet (or .0000179 square miles, since that’s the units we’re going to have to be dealing with), would take up 130,925 square miles. A 2-story building covering the entirety of either Florida or Wisconsin (each about 65,000 square miles) could house all of these people. Or better yet, a 1-story building in each, so people could have some climate options.

      1. Mark P Warkentin Avatar
        Mark P Warkentin
        Hide

        Thanks for the calculations, you answered my question very well.

    2. Jonathan Miller Avatar
      Jonathan Miller
      Hide

      500 square feet wod only be the usable space for living. Add in corridors, elevators, HVAC, plumbing and mechanical rooms to house all this equipment and it’s going to need to be 2 to 3 times larger. A mothership to hold the entire population would be awesome, we should start building it.

    3. Willeen Olivier Avatar
      Willeen Olivier
      Hide

      In this discussion all of you forget about the need for air, water and food. And I doubt whether 1200 people would be enough. The Afrikaner founding population was way bigger than that, and consisted of genetically diverse people from around the globe, and yet certain genetic diseases are much more prevelant in this population than anywhere else.

  58. Snazster Avatar
    Snazster
    Hide

    Fascinating. About ten years ago I did my own estimate of how many human beings there had ever been and came up with 107 billion, so 100 billion that had gone before. I was doing it to try to figure how much time the human race has left, based on a mathematical formula by a guy named Gott that presumes that a sampling of one (myself or yourself) is not an extreme in when we live (as we would be if modern man goes on to settle millions of planets, each with billions of people).

    When I apply this formula to modern man, based on 107 billion people having existed, with 7 billion currently alive, it predicted a 95% chance we have maybe three generations left at current numbers (less if our numbers climb much higher) or, if we have a catastrophic die off (say to one hundred million or less) we still only get about seventeen more generations.

    In other words, it seemed like it was saying homo sapiens goes out in a big way in three generations, or something that’s still pretty bad happens and we kinda linger for a few centuries before exiting stage left.

    Then it occured to me that Cro-magnon man would have gotten similar results showing that his own remaining time was limited–yet though Cro-magon man’s days did come to an end, it is only because Cro-magnons gradually became us.

    That makes me hopeful that, whatever supplants us in the next sixty years or so, it’s something we are proud of and perhaps even proud of becoming. At a guess, I would say we will probably become several follow-on races, gene-altered man, bionic man, virtual reality man, homo immortalis, etc. (some of which may be divergences into dead ends) and it will be the groups, primarily religious ones, that reject many advanced technologies, that linger on as the last of our race for the next seventeen generations or so, constantly becoming ever less relevant to the main stream.

  59. Elchar Avatar
    Elchar
    Hide

    Organizing by religion, putting Jews and Muslims in one neighborhood. There is no way this can ever go wrong. 😀

    1. givemethemic Avatar
      givemethemic
      Hide

      the Jews would be alright with it. but the Muslims would feel the need to EXTERMINATE! (think Dalek.)

      1. disqus_pchTNla1P1 Avatar
        disqus_pchTNla1P1
        Hide

        Are you sure? Because precisely the opposite is going on in Palestine right now. Before the inception of Israel Jews and Muslims were living in peace.

        1. MoonshineSA Avatar
          MoonshineSA
          Hide

          What made the inception of Israel stop the Muslims and Jews from living in peace?

          1. Geena D Avatar
            Geena D
            Hide

            THE muslims deciding that Jews dont deserve to live in their indigenous ancestral homeland, land they Bought from the Ottoman Empire to live on. The Arabs/ Muslims just didn’t want and Jews there.

        2. Michael Zellhart Avatar
          Michael Zellhart
          Hide

          The inception of Israel was thousands of years before Muhammad told his girlfriend to write down his hallucinations.

        3. Geena D Avatar
          Geena D
          Hide

          That is such a false narrative not based on documented history.

        4. Rdavidovna Avatar
          Rdavidovna
          Hide

          PLEASE look into the decades of massacres of Arabs/Muslims on Jews in Eretz Israel most recently starting in the 1880s. The ottoman Turks opened the land to be purchased by people outside the empire starting in 1860 as a hope to gain favor of the French and western world. First Christians started moving back then Jews also. Around 1800 a Turkish surveyor counted about 200k people living in the area and it was considered “a malaria swampland”. As more land began being purchased, the Arab Muslims/ bedouins started having to pay higher taxes and resented Jews living there (as happened in most Arab/. Muslim countries despite a narrative of peaceful living- which actually was living as second class citizens and paying higher taxes and not having the same rights and protections as Muslims). This kumbayah myth of Muslims and jews living in peace is part of the false narrative that has grown to try and vililanize Jews as ungrateful unpeaceful people when it is literally projection., There is no land in history which Muslims have conquered and allowed peaceful existence–just tolerated subhuman citizenship with exorbitant taxes. NOT one place that Jews have ever resettled have they tried to convert by force or punishment the people around them.

          If you want to see a place where Muslims and Jews live in peace, IT IS IN ISRAEL. And that is because it is a Jewish State that welcomes peaceful citizenry and affords them the same rights and tax structure as their own people. THE only difference is that conscription in the army is non required of non-Jews. Many join anyway,. Because they are proud to say AM YISROEL CHAI!

          PS…BONUS for you Pali Arabs have not lived in peace in any of the places they sought to become refuges. Kuwait, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon Egypt– they all were eventually denied citizenship, work visas, and exiled because of things like Black September and incitement of civil war., oh and assassinating heads of state and starting terrorist groups. Since the 1950s Palis have exported their only national currency which is terrorism. From the Munich Olympics, to plane hijackings, embassy bombings, suicide bombings and even assassinating the relative of a US president (RFK). This invented Palestinian identity is known mostly for causing death and terror on all corners of the globe.

          So no- there was no kumbayah and when the Arab League told Palis to evacuate in 1948 so they could destroy the state of Israel. THey lost and those that chose to become Israeli citizens did, and the rest just spent the last 75+ years on international welfare honing in their methods of terror and indoctrinating their children to be hateful blood thirsty hopeful martyrs, even though when they get what they want they complain they are victims and keep teaching 4 year olds to hunt for Jewish blood and resist peace. KINDLY EDUCATE YOURSELF instead of being an echo chamber of Jihadi Propaganda that only leads to death.

          Israel is not going anywhere. Learn to live in peace or die trying to destroy them.

      2. James Slover Avatar
        James Slover
        Hide

        Just the body temperature of ten people per square meter would seem like hell on earth if all the people were squeezed into the space of New York City. My brother and I walked into a single story home maybe 2500sq ft with 180 people inside and air-conditioning on full. Windows and doors were open and it was 32 degrees outside but it was 75 degrees plus inside.

  60. Scott Webster Wood Avatar
    Scott Webster Wood
    Hide

    I did a similar calculation. I used staggering of rows so that no one person was closer than 4.5 feet from any other person to give ample room for everyone. (I used 4.5 feet as an approximate average length of the outstretched arms of both people) By staggering the rows, you can slightly condense the spacing below 4.5 feet to still give everyone a radius of 4 1/2 feet. (sort of like the intersections of a hex-grid)
    Using this formula, the square footage that would be necessary to have the entire human race in once place was about the square footage of the state of Rhode Island.
    I then ran the calculation again and did it instead for the equivalent of a standing-room-only crowd and it didn’t even fill half the city of Providence, RI.

    I ran another just now on the volume. (kinda morbid, but assuming you blended up the entire human race into a ‘mush’, how much cubic volume would it fill?) I found ranges from 65 liters up to 95 liters as the average human volume. So I calculated from the ‘high’ number of 95 and it was less than 1/5th of a cubic mile. (0.171m^3)

  61. Lord Fawful Avatar
    Lord Fawful
    Hide

    You realize that everyone would immediately die of heatstroke due to everyone around them emitting residual heat… right? Humans simply cannot survive in such a dense 99-degree environment, ESPECIALlY not one that quickly heats to 105+.

    1. Lord Fawful Avatar
      Lord Fawful
      Hide

      Not to mention that after THAT takes effect, they would be unable to efficiently disperse heat, warming everyone further yet. Your only chance at surviving this is to be near the door and GET THE FUCK OUT.

      1. dittoheadadt Avatar
        dittoheadadt
        Hide

        What door?

  62. ChristineT Avatar
    ChristineT
    Hide

    All I can say is he’s crazy good at math!

  63. Jae Faul Avatar
    Jae Faul
    Hide

    So if there was a global emergency and all the humans needed to be in one place temporarily, we could all fit in New York City. No wonder people keep immigrating to North America. What subtle suggestion has been implanted? What is coming on the world scene that might require that kind of mass escape? Get ready everybody. It is time to learn to get along. At that moment it would not matter what skin color, how much money, or whatever crazy differences could we come up with would matter. Everybody could live in North America. Yeah!!!

  64. BonVoyage Avatar
    BonVoyage
    Hide

    Whole topic can be collapsed with a possible synchronous jump.

    Vivid illustrations 🙂

    1. Lord Fawful Avatar
      Lord Fawful
      Hide

      Everyone jumping at once wouldn’t do a damn thing. It’d create MAYBE a magnitude 1-2 earthquake (not even bad enough to destroy most buildings) and that’d be it. And the Earth would be knocked out of its orbit… by about the width of a fucking proton.

  65. xieheihei Avatar
    xieheihei
    Hide

    good

  66. Roberto Avatar
    Roberto
    Hide

    Good. Now think about all this cramped space speculation whenever you’re eating chicken.

  67. norarcarr Avatar
    norarcarr
    Hide

    0=03Now Get this advantage

  68. Mikebjones Avatar
    Mikebjones
    Hide

    Go toOur Community w a i t b w- Online money

  69. Hollie Avatar
    Hollie
    Hide

    Last 40 year Best Home Income with waitbutwhy < ……. Find Here

  70. CorneliaDMackey Avatar
    CorneliaDMackey
    Hide

    Some New Features with waitbutwhy….. Go To Next Page

  71. MaxMWheeler Avatar
    MaxMWheeler
    Hide

    Some New Features with waitbutwhy….. Go To Next Page

  72. JeremyEHayes Avatar
    JeremyEHayes
    Hide

    Some New Features with waitbutwhy….. Go To Next Page

  73. NancyCPalmer Avatar
    NancyCPalmer
    Hide

    ….next few days your life success days…waitbutwhy….. < Find Here

  74. TimothyMBennett Avatar
    TimothyMBennett
    Hide

    Next few days start your new life…waitbutwhy… < Find Here

  75. MichaelHFerguson Avatar
    MichaelHFerguson
    Hide

    22222Ultra Income source by waitbutwhy Find Here

  76. ElsaCWalker Avatar
    ElsaCWalker
    Hide

    Your first choice waitbutwhy Find Here

  77. Losent Avatar
    Losent
    Hide

    < ✜✱✪✪✲✜.+waitbutwhy+ ********* ….. < Now Go R­e­­a­d M­o­r­e

    19

  78. Hannah Avatar
    Hannah
    Hide

    —-*****—- i like me waitbutwhy… ………… Continue Reading

  79. AshleyJMille Avatar
    AshleyJMille
    Hide

    ….All time hit the waitbutwhy Find Here

  80. ChristyCTaylor Avatar
    ChristyCTaylor
    Hide

    Some time hit the waitbutwhy. Find Here

  81. ChristyCTaylor Avatar
    ChristyCTaylor
    Hide

    fddfdfdf

  82. Troarat45 Avatar
    Troarat45
    Hide

    < ✜✱✪✪✲✜.+waitbutwhy+ ********* ….. < Now Go R­e­­a­d M­o­r­e

    4

  83. KarenDWingo Avatar
    KarenDWingo
    Hide

    All time hit waitbutwhy Find Here

  84. JohnGBolin Avatar
    JohnGBolin
    Hide

    Your first choice waitbutwhy Find Here

  85. JohnASilcox Avatar
    JohnASilcox
    Hide

    Reset your job with waitbutwhy Find Here

  86. Alexstrazsa Avatar
    Alexstrazsa
    Hide

    What happens when you try to expand it so that each human has a (semi) comfortable room to live in? Sort of like a massive, humanity-encompassing apartment. How much power would it need for lights? What about the plumbing!?

  87. Lefuld Avatar
    Lefuld
    Hide

    < ✜✱✪✪✲✜ +waitbutwhy +*********….. < Now Go R­e­­a­d M­o­r­e

    22

  88. Margaret Avatar
    Margaret
    Hide

    ———- that’s a full enjoy withwaitbutwhy… < Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $177 per hour. I work through this link,

    go to tech tab for work detail _________ Continue Reading

  89. Gayle Avatar
    Gayle
    Hide

    ———- that’s a full enjoy with waitbutwhy ****** _________ Continue Reading

  90. jeffhre Avatar
    jeffhre
    Hide

    Hi Tim, and Shawn too. With 7.3 billion inside, what would be the rated capacity of the AC units on a hot humid NYC Day?

    And I bet the concessionaires could do a great business at that building. If they could just think outside of the box.

    1. Nils Sens Avatar
      Nils Sens
      Hide

      let’s just say that NYC would be heated to body temperature

      1. A guy Avatar
        A guy
        Hide

        Higher. We’d all get heatstroke from everyone else’s body heat, and then we’d be unable to efficiently disperse heat, so we’d get even hotter. 99 degrees? Fuck that. Think 110+.

        1. Anonymous Avatar
          Anonymous
          Hide

          what if its a cold winter day lets, say a high if 15 degrees Fahrenheit and low of -8 degrees with snow with a 25 mph wind speed and 40 mph wind gusts, I’m pretty positive we would be comfortable have you been in this type of weather, its bone chilling????

  91. Lorraine Avatar
    Lorraine
    Hide

    ——– i like me waitbutwhy… _________ Keep Reading

  92. Brandi Avatar
    Brandi
    Hide

    ——— SSSSSSoooooo Extra Cute profit with waitbutwhy ——- ——— Keep Reading

  93. Sawly1971 Avatar
    Sawly1971
    Hide

    < col Hiiiiiii Friends..''.——–''.▬▬▬▬★★ that's a full enjoy with+ waitbutwhy+ ********* < Find More='' ……..''

    ????????????????????????????????????????????????????y

  94. Helen Avatar
    Helen
    Hide

    ▬▬▬▬★★★★ that’s a full enjoy with waitbutwhy ********* ▬▬▬▬▬☛ Continue Reading

  95. Dawn Avatar
    Dawn
    Hide

    ▬▬▬▬★★★★ that’s a full enjoy with waitbutwhy… ▬▬▬▬▬☛ Continue Reading

  96. Gwen Avatar
    Gwen
    Hide

    ▬▬▬▬★★★★ that’s a full enjoy with waitbutwhy——- ▬▬▬▬▬☛ Continue Reading

  97. Martin Stoehr Avatar
    Martin Stoehr
    Hide

    Interesting–I missed this post from last month. I actually did a comparable analysis a few years ago…

    http://gargoyleeyes-rsf.blogspot.com/2009/04/i-was-talking-with-paul-kalthoff-today.html

    My estimate of pureed humans was made with about 6.8B people on the planet but comes pretty close to Tim’s estimate considering the 14ppl/m^3 versus 6ppl/m^3 volumes.

    1. kalsonmandela Avatar
      kalsonmandela
      Hide

      ☁☁☁☁it’s Easy Make With waitbutwhy < i started working online, completing some basic jobs that only requires from you a computer and internet access and I am happier than ever… It's been 6 months since i started this and i got paid so far total of 36,000 bucks… Basicly i profit close to 80 bucks/h and work for 3-4 hrs most of the days.Best part to whole this thing is that you can decide when to work yourself and for how long and you get a paycheck
      at the end of each week. Here’s A More Detail

    2. GenderEquality Avatar
      GenderEquality
      Hide

      It’s Easy for make with waitbutwhy < i started working online, completing some basic jobs that only requires from you a computer and internet access and I am happier than ever… It's been 6 months since i started this and i got paid so far total of 36,000 bucks… Basicly i profit close to 80 bucks/h and work for 3-4 hrs most of the days.Best part to whole this thing is that you can decide when to work yourself and for how long and you get a paycheck

      at the end of each week. SEE MORE INFO

    3. MJSANTILLI Avatar
      MJSANTILLI
      Hide

      It’s very Easy with waitbutwhy < my neighbor's mom makes $64 hourly on the computer . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her check was $14236 just working on the computer for a few hours.

      learn the facts here now SEE MORE DETAIL

    4. ElizabethLicata Avatar
      ElizabethLicata
      Hide

      It’s simple to work with waitbutwhy < my neighbor's mom makes $64 hourly on the computer . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her check was $14236 just working on the computer for a few hours.

      learn the facts here now SEE COMPLETE INFO

    5. DarrynBonthuys Avatar
      DarrynBonthuys
      Hide

      ♫♫With♫♫ ♪♪♪waitbutwhy♪♪♪.-. < my neighbor's mom makes $64 hourly on the computer . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her check was $14236 just working on the computer for a few hours.

      learn the facts here now GET MORE INFO

      1. thewildnath Avatar
        thewildnath
        Hide

        No she doesn’t.

  98. Seth Heristal Avatar
    Seth Heristal
    Hide

    Would the M&M surpass the Schwarzschild Radius and become a Black Hole?

    1. Max_White Avatar
      Max_White
      Hide

      No.

      Mt Everest has a mass of around 3*10^15 and the Schwarzschild limit for it is a nanometer.

      Humanity weighs around 3 orders ofagnitude LESS

    2. A guy Avatar
      A guy
      Hide

      Nope. The M&M would have a regular radius approximately equal to the Schwarzschild radius of the whole planet.

  99. Kenny Chaffin Avatar

    AH yes, the ol’ John Varley Stand on Zanzibar – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand_on_Zanzibar

  100. Ilpalazzo Avatar
    Ilpalazzo
    Hide

    So out of curiosity, since this has no practical application and only serves to try to take things further (albeit discarding usefulness and only serves to question the means of the NY test)— what drugs is this guy on?

  101. Paradalis Avatar
    Paradalis
    Hide

    I would be much more interested in the amount of space people need (built-up, and land). You can get this from the ecofootprint, but then you could take it further to see if in the future, we could reduce that space down, say if all people worked from home so we didn’t need offices, and used virtual reality to visit friends, so we don’t need transportation networks.

    1. Max_White Avatar
      Max_White
      Hide

      That would be a sort of lonely existence.

      I’m all for the work from home stuff, but I’d rather see my friends in meat space then in vspace

  102. NA Avatar
    NA
    Hide

    I’m disappointed that there was no mention of a Dyson Sphere of people linked to each other by their limbs.

  103. Wrong Bobby Avatar
    Wrong Bobby
    Hide

    Surprisingly interesting subject. I’d like to know how large a buildig it would take to have everyone actually live comfortably, say in a two room apartment each.

    1. Max_White Avatar
      Max_White
      Hide

      is the 2rm for a single person, couple or a family of 4?

      Now, it’s been a million years or so since I’ve used math, but if we go for the couple, we get a volume of 934 billion m^3 if each couple had an apartment sized 16*8*2.

      Or so..

  104. Martijn Müller Avatar
    Martijn Müller
    Hide

    I know you’re just trying to fit everyone in, but I chuckled when organizing for religion, you decided to put Jews and Muslims together in Brooklyn.

    1. passerby Avatar
      passerby
      Hide

      Haha I think he hates Brooklyn

    2. Momus Avatar
      Momus
      Hide

      Well, they do get along inside Israel

  105. GoneCamping Avatar
    GoneCamping
    Hide

    Has anyone read Riverworld, by Philip José Farmer? All humans that have ever lived are reincarnated on the banks of a very long river.

    1. Марк Сафронов Avatar

      I have read. Judging by these calculations, this should be *a VERY* long river, given that aliens have given a lot more space for each person than a 1 m squared. 🙂

      1. Steve H Avatar
        Steve H
        Hide

        20 million miles long in Farmer’s books, but the figure he uses for all the humans who ever lived is 36 billion.

        1. airira Avatar
          airira
          Hide

          Except, according to Arthur C. Clarke, the number of humans who have lived and died on this planet in totality is around 100 billion. And he came up with that figure almost 60 years ago.

  106. […] together, how much space do you think they would take? We don’t have to do the math because my new favourite blog has the answer. All the humans on the planet Earth, without the empty space in them, would easily […]

  107. […] don’t have to do the math because my new favorite blog has the answer. All the humans on the planet Earth, without the empty space in them, would easily fit in one […]

  108. […] don’t have to do the math because my new favorite blog has the answer. All the humans on the planet Earth, without the empty space in them, would easily fit in one […]

  109. Vysakh S Avatar
    Vysakh S
    Hide

    Did anybody else spot the sole smiling and winking dude amongst that sea of desperate and angry stick figures?

    Nice touch, Tim.

    1. Scott Avatar
      Scott
      Hide

      Ha yes, I was looking for a while on a hunch that tim would do something like that. Of course he didn’t disappoint.

    2. Rodrigo Gomes Avatar
      Rodrigo Gomes
      Hide

      Oh! Actually I had skipped the drawing assuming that it was just a bunch of people. Now I am coming back to the picture, it is so rich in details, so full of expressiveness… I cannot stop looking at it.

    3. dudebuddypal Avatar
      dudebuddypal
      Hide

      That’s one of those weirdos on the Japanese trains who tries to cop a feel of everyone. One man’s hell is another’s heaven. It’s all about attitude!

  110. Siron Avatar
    Siron
    Hide

    This M&M would collapse in a tiny black hole)

    1. ericsp23 Avatar
      ericsp23
      Hide

      Actually, no it wouldn’t. You would have to shrink humanity down to the size of a proton before it would be dense enough to become a black hole. The M&M would be the same density as a neutron star though.

  111. Strange but untrue Avatar
    Strange but untrue
    Hide

    7.3 billion humans in four-dimensional configurations

    If we had access to a fourth dimension, you could could create a hypercube out of the whole world population with side length less than 300 people… If you could travel around it at walking pace, you could get to any other living person within a few minutes.

    But then again, if people were infinitesimally thin in the fourth dimension, you could stack all 7.3 billion up in a single 4D pile that basically didn’t take up any more room than a single human.

    1. dudebuddypal Avatar
      dudebuddypal
      Hide

      The 4th dimension is time. are you referring to a 5th dimension or a 4th spacial dimension?

      1. Adam Collet Avatar
        Adam Collet
        Hide

        There is no (agreed upon) ordinality to dimensions, and although time is conveniently described as a dimension for many purposes, mathematically speaking it is not (it is, there and in science, sometimes treated similarly and sometimes identically, but on the whole it is not the same). The implied meaning was definitely spatial.

  112. Mark P. Avatar
    Hide

    How long would it take to eat that M&M?

    1. Seth Heristal Avatar
      Seth Heristal
      Hide

      How long would it take to digest that?

      1. NormaRSmith Avatar
        NormaRSmith
        Hide

        Your first choice waitbutwhy Find Here

  113. Jay Avatar
    Jay
    Hide

    http://www.fastcompany.com/3042312/most-creative-people/the-secrets-of-writing-smart-longform-articles-that-go-absolutely-viral 🙂

  114. momtarkle Avatar
    momtarkle
    Hide

    How is a circle “one dimensional”?

    1. sabs546 Avatar
      sabs546
      Hide

      It has no face
      Just an outline
      I had to think about it a bit
      It has not corners either just one edge

      1. momtarkle Avatar
        momtarkle
        Hide

        A circle is two dimensional. In polar coordinates its radius is one coordinate, its arc, 2 pi, is the other.

        In the x, y coordinate system it is an evenly curved line with “width” d and “length” d, where “d” is the circle’s diameter.

        If the circle’s center is at point x=0, y=0, its equation is y2+x2=1. (Those 2s are supposed to represent “square”.

        1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
          DeeDee Massey
          Hide

          A circle is one-dimensional.

          In mathematical terms, a “circle” is line without a surface that completes the circumference, with each point on the line equidistant from a common center. The line has a measurable length – the 1st dimension. The filled-in surface is a “disk” with a measurable width, the diameter – the second dimension. In the 3rd dimension, it has depth, either as in the shape of a “cylinder”, where 2 circles (disks) on separate planes have a parallel distance from each other, or as in the case of a “sphere”, where all points of the outer surface are equidistant from the center.

          1. sabs546 Avatar
            sabs546
            Hide

            This whole thing just got blown out of proportion
            He just made a ring and decided it would be simple to call it one dimensional since it wasnt filled in

            1. momtarkle Avatar
              momtarkle
              Hide

              So, the perimeter of a triangle is also one dimensional, right? (It isn’t filled in.)

            2. sabs546 Avatar
              sabs546
              Hide

              not like that
              I’m it wasn’t meant to be anything meaningful
              I’m surprised you don’t just get the gist of it
              People are just overthinking this

          2. momtarkle Avatar
            momtarkle
            Hide

            You live in a peculiar world, DeeDee. If we ignore time (actually duration) as the fourth dimension: A point has no dimensions. A straight line segment, no matter what its length is, has one dimension: length. A curved line, such as a circle, must have at least two dimensions or it would be straight. (A curved line can have three dimensions.) Got that straight?

            By your logic, the surface of a sphere is one dimensional. Balls, I say!

            1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
              DeeDee Massey
              Hide

              Please politely provide a reliable source for your definitions. A line does not necessarily have to be straight to possess one dimension.

              http://www.fractalwisdom.com/science-of-chaos/the-five-dimensions/first-dimension/

              Dimensions in the article’s context are topological measures. For the circle, the measures correspond as:

              0 – point on a circle, “the point”

              1st – circumference, the “line”

              2nd – area, the “plane”

              3rd – volume. the “solid”

              It’s semantics, but it can be argued that a circle is one-dimensional and the disk is the two-dimensional shape. At any rate, the use of “one-dimensional” is accurate within the context of the article. Individuals standing in one of those lines that takes a curvy, circular path, would have the intrinsic view of only being able to move forward or backward in line. If they were standing on the surface of a sphere, they’d have more options.

              http://www.learner.org/courses/mathilluminated/units/8/textbook/06.php

            2. momtarkle Avatar
              momtarkle
              Hide

              Sorry, I don’t do politely.

              You are right; I am wrong. A circle can exist in either two-dimensional
              or three-dimensional space (or even higher-dimensional spaces), but it
              is a one-dimensional object.

              A line segment, which is one-dimensional, can be deformed into a
              circle. We can think of the line as elastic. A circular disk, which
              is two-dimensional, can be deformed elastically into a sphere.

              Somehow, I still feel right.

            3. DeeDee Massey Avatar
              DeeDee Massey
              Hide

              In some contexts, we both are. 🙂
              The universe and the “laws” that govern it are amazing and intriguing. And to think, as a species, we likely have only scratched the surface in our attempt to fathom and define it in a way that makes any coherent sense.

            4. dudebuddypal Avatar
              dudebuddypal
              Hide

              a circle has no width, only length. Hence it is one dimensional

  115. Basketcase Avatar
    Basketcase
    Hide

    ok, ok, I’m going back to read the post, but just wanted to say SQUEEEE about the e-reader version of year one! Have gone straight off and bought it 🙂 Hope you guys are making a few cents out of each edition at least. Keep it up!

  116. Titus Groan Avatar
    Titus Groan
    Hide

    ok ok, a question please. At the current rate of population growth, when will we make up the mass of a single M&M?

    We’re a bit short at the moment you say? So on what date will we be able to completely fill up a single M&M?

    I ask because on that day, that momentous M&M day, I want to celebrate. And mark it as a milestone in population growth. The day we hit a whole M&M. Its like a population singularity.

    Please tell us! When will it be!?

    1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
      DeeDee Massey
      Hide

      sometime(ish)

      1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
        DeeDee Massey
        Hide

        While you’re calculating that, Tim, at what point, if not already, would the space-bagged mass of all the world’s nerds fit inside the size of one average.. Nerd?

  117. […] Steam Link streams PC games anywhere within your house >> * 7.3 Billion People, One Building >> * Curiosity rover on Mars benched after a short circuit […]

  118. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
    Zonnestraaltje
    Hide

    “if” everybody would love everybody we wouldn’t need in between space at all
    give erverybody a hug!

  119. Rodolink Avatar
    Rodolink
    Hide

    mindblown with that M&M human mass fact…

  120. Aaron, just.... Aaron Avatar
    Aaron, just…. Aaron
    Hide

    Here’s a question; would concentrating all that human mass in such a small area have any affect on the earth’s rotation; on it’s axis or in orbit? Would it start out like a tiny irregularity and then get progressively bigger the longer that mass stayed uneven? Or would there be no effect considering the relatively tiny proportion of our combined mass vs that of the earth? Earth is estimated to weigh around 1.317×10^25 lbs (13,170 with 21 more zeroes), and our combined human mass would be around 5.069 quadrillion lbs, which means we’re only actually concentrating 0.00000000003849% of the total mass on one spot on the surface. Would that have any effect?

    1. Louis A. Cook Avatar
      Louis A. Cook
      Hide

      Are wind turbines affecting the rotation of the earth?

      1. Aaron, just.... Aaron Avatar
        Aaron, just…. Aaron
        Hide

        Is this a serious question or are you trolling? Because i don’t see the relevance to my point.

        1. Kayne Hellwin Avatar
          Kayne Hellwin
          Hide

          A couple years ago somebody did a mockumentary-style panel discussion with a bunch of TV talking heads discussing how “wind turbines are slowing the earth’s rotation”, and making such deep and probing statements as “And wind…. what IS wind? We don’t even know what WIND is…”, as they discussed the implications of this “newfangled, mysterious technology”. Pseudo-science taken to bizarre extremes.
          It was hilarious.
          Louis A. Cook may have seen it. And believed it.

          1. Louis A. Cook Avatar
            Louis A. Cook
            Hide

            It was just a joke for your benefit. No trolling. Have an awesome day 🙂

        2. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
          Zonnestraaltje
          Hide

          trolling? just a little off-topic
          mathematical you may concentrate all mass in one point-singularity-
          the Earth would stat wobbling as an excentric system , which although would be dempened by the vast amounts of the seawater, as is caused by the movement of the moon

      2. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
        Zonnestraaltje
        Hide

        yes

      3. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
        Zonnestraaltje
        Hide

        not relevant , dr. Spock would say

    2. Kayne Hellwin Avatar
      Kayne Hellwin
      Hide

      EEEEE-ffect! “Effect”. NOT “Affect”. “…would all that human mass in such a small area have any EFFECT on the earth’s rotation…”.
      There IS a big difference between “affect” and “effect”. And an even bigger one between “affected” and “effected”. And so on.

      1. Aaron, just.... Aaron Avatar
        Aaron, just…. Aaron
        Hide

        Jesus christ, I messed it up once out of the four times I used it. Clearly you read my entire post. Appreciate your super condescending reply though.

    3. DeeDee Massey Avatar
      DeeDee Massey
      Hide

      It follows in the mind that such weight-shifting probably would make a difference. But then, look at the size of the iceberg calving video that Louis A. Cook posted earlier in the comments. That magnitude of mass movement has to have some type of affect on the Earth. I’m just not sure what the effect would be. 🙂

    4. Jeff Lewis Avatar
      Jeff Lewis
      Hide

      I think you answered the question yourself (I ran a similar calculation and came out a couple orders of magnitude different than you, but still at a miniscule number). The effect on the Earth’s rotation would hardly be noticeable. Another way to look at it is that the mass of Mount Everest is something like 3e15 kg (according to this site, at least: http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_mass_of_Mount_Everest ), several orders of magnitude more than all of humanity, and all concentrated in one spot. Do you notice anything weird caused by Everest?
      If you somehow manage to move large enough amounts of mass around the earth to measure any change in the Earth’s rotation, the change will stabilize as soon as you stop moving the masses. The Earth will spin about it’s center of mass, wherever that mass happens to be. By moving things around, you’re mainly just shifting the center of mass.

      1. Aaron, just.... Aaron Avatar
        Aaron, just…. Aaron
        Hide

        Indeed, though, I might counter the Everest argument with Everest having been in one place for millions of years vs. Tim’s people concentration happening over a significantly shorter period of time.
        Realistically though, I would be inclined to agree with your second paragraph. Any adjustment would likely be miniscule, and most likely would be balanced out (or possibly ignored completely, given the ultra-low percentage of the total mass) by the planet in relatively short order. : )

  121. drew66 Avatar
    drew66
    Hide

    Why is one guy smiling while everyone else is so unhappy? And who is this one guy anyway?

    1. Cookie Fonster Avatar
    2. Steve H Avatar
      Steve H
      Hide

      He’s the guy that farted.

  122. bbroome62 Avatar
    bbroome62
    Hide

    It seems we don’t have a population problem that could cause a food shortage, but an efficiency problem in the distribution of food. Keep procreating folks.

    1. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
      Zonnestraaltje
      Hide

      don’t worry, the prediction for 2020 is 9 billion people, that is in 1,7 billion in no more than 5 years.

      1. AKmotorider Avatar
        AKmotorider
        Hide

        At 19, I sure hope the world isn’t overpopulated by the time I, or my generation, dies.

    2. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
      Zonnestraaltje
      Hide

      the distribution must not be to efficient, because the world population would grow even faster, just like pollution.

  123. v43 Avatar
    v43
    Hide

    PS: not that you should care or worry, but I really don’t like this kind of posts or post about numerology in general. I’ll wait patiently for those about introspection, or the inspiring kind, or the adventurous ones.
    bye

    1. Kayne Hellwin Avatar
      Kayne Hellwin
      Hide

      Whhaaaatt??
      Do you even OWN a dictionary??
      “Numerology” is the fakey pseudo-science of casting fortunes or “seeing into your future” using numbers series derived from analysis of the letters in your name.
      The article above is about mathematics, statistical analysis and arithmetic extrapolation.
      All of which apparently escapes you.
      Better go back to bed and get introspective.

      1. v43 Avatar
        v43
        Hide

        I don’t know, I am not gonna read it this time. I had enough with the size of cubes water, big numbers and stuff like that (which I really really did not like): those were just posts about numbers, with little significance. If you like this kind of stuff, good for you. I am waiting for things that better suit my taste

    2. Markoff Avatar
      Markoff
      Hide

      yeah, it was waste of time, I came here waiting for some design of building which could house all human rice, probably something of shape huge pyramid

  124. v43 Avatar
    v43
    Hide

    this rationalism about human bodies bears a vague reminiscence of Auschwitz

  125. The Gingerbeardman Avatar
    The Gingerbeardman
    Hide

    This last point reminded me of the Morpheus/battery analogy.

  126. Sam Avatar
    Sam
    Hide

    I wonder if, in the two-dimensional configurations, it could be arranged so that no one stood next to a stranger?

    1. barry Avatar
      barry
      Hide

      Excellent question! Centre your calcs on hermits….

  127. JFV Avatar
    JFV
    Hide

    That squishing of atoms reminds me of a neutron star or some other celestial object in which everything is squished down. I think the mass of the planet Earth can fit into a teaspoon. Too bad Spock (RIP) can’t weigh in on this.

  128. JP Avatar
    JP
    Hide

    What If but why

  129. Adam Avatar
    Adam
    Hide

    When I started reading, I thought “I’m sure we’ve been here before” (with the Tunisia post), but this was very interesting.

    To go even further, expand “humans” to “all animals”. How much space do non-human animals take up? How big a building do you need to fit all animals on earth? Going beyond that, how about other organisms? Plants? Bacteria? Viruses? I understand that the statistics required might be very difficult to find (if even vaguely reliable estimates exist at all), but does anyone have any clue at all as to how much space non-human organisms take up?

    1. Tim Urban Avatar
      Tim Urban
      Hide

      I had a few dark moments while working on this post where I’d realize I was 37 minutes into research on how much space all ants take up or how heavy all combined rhinos are and be like “COME ON” and get back to the post.

  130. Sus Avatar
    Sus
    Hide

    One of the first of your articles that made me ask “Wait but why…would anyone want/need this information?” I kept waiting for some philosophical insight at the end to answer the question but was left wondering instead. I guess for the sake of curiosity? :S

    1. TerranRich Avatar
      Hide

      Wait but why…. NOT?

    2. DeeDee Massey Avatar
      DeeDee Massey
      Hide

      …So we can figure out how big of an ark to build, only we’ll have convert all those measurements to cubits, which means Noah will have to be the one we bring back from the dead. 🙂

  131. dogfood411 Avatar
    dogfood411
    Hide

    So now we need to figure out how long it would take to get everyone in there to prove this.

    1. Jeff Lewis Avatar
      Jeff Lewis
      Hide

      https://what-if.xkcd.com/8/

      1. dogfood411 Avatar
        dogfood411
        Hide

        Precisely the post I was thinking about.

  132. Chuck Shotton Avatar

    If you put all the humans in a blender first, it works out to a cube of liquid humans roughly 2445 feet on a side.

    1. bbroome62 Avatar
      bbroome62
      Hide

      That’s a lot of soylent green.

      1. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
        Zonnestraaltje
        Hide

        it would perfectly fit in a giant rubber bag.

  133. Mirko Avatar
    Mirko
    Hide

    I don’t know if I’m the only one, but I started clicking on the links from the first paragraph and re-read most of your articles instead of reading this one.

  134. d Avatar
    d
    Hide

    Lovely, lovely, thank you Tim.
    On the other hand, if all the edges of what we are a basically electrons orbiting a vast expanse of ’empty’ space around their nucleous – by that reckoning, we are defined by ghost perimeter and where we end and the rest of the world begins is not at all clear cut, just like that little girl told Neo that one time.

  135. PepijnNL Avatar
    PepijnNL
    Hide

    Actually, being in space without a suit would not instantly kill you… You’d suffocate pretty soon, yes, but the whole exploding because of zero pressure thing doesn’t happen in reality, sorry 😉

    1. Dren^ Odeb Avatar
      Dren^ Odeb
      Hide

      Your blood would reach boiling point instantly, so there won’t even be time for suffocating…

      1. PepijnNL Avatar
        PepijnNL
        Hide

        Yeah, that sounds terrible, but you still don’t die instantly. According to the Wikipedia page on space exposure you have about 14 seconds before losing consciousness, and up to 90 seconds before you can’t recover from it.
        I know wiki isn’t the best of sources but I have read a document from NASA before stating about the same and specifically debunking the idea that you or parts of you would actually explode. I went on a bit of a Google tangent after seeing an episode of farscape in which John Crichton jumped from one space ship to another without a suit, and I felt really disappointed because I thought it was so unrealistic. Turns out, they actually did it very well. It is in fact possible if you’re fast enough and they did a very good job of giving him the symptoms you’d expect from doing that 🙂

        1. Kayne Hellwin Avatar
          Kayne Hellwin
          Hide

          The first example of jumping through space relatively suitless was in “2001 – A Space Odyssey” where Dave has to get back into the main spaceship after Hal the (going neurotic) supercomputer “locks” him out, and he must bust a hatch to get back in.
          The scene is great because it uses the knowledge as outlined above; showing the short space of time he has to close the ship hatch behind him and repressurize, before either passing out or suffering other effects.
          And, realistically, the scene is done in complete silence… the kind of thing you expect in an airless environment.

      2. Jeff Lewis Avatar
        Jeff Lewis
        Hide

        Not really. Your body’s a good enough pressure vessel that that wouldn’t happen. During a space suit test back in the ’60s, a failure subjected a guy named Jim LeBlanc to a near vacuum for several seconds, and then reduced pressure for the 87 seconds it took to repressurize the chamber. “As I stumbled backwards, I could feel the saliva on my tongue starting to bubble just before I went unconscious and that’s the last thing I remember.”

        http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/aerospace-engineering/space-suit-design/early-spacesuit-vacuum-test-wrong/

        1. Dren^ Odeb Avatar
          Dren^ Odeb
          Hide

          Thanks, that useful.

  136. Louis A. Cook Avatar
    Louis A. Cook
    Hide

    This post makes me think of this thing I saw recently for scale:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC3VTgIPoGU

    Thanks for sending a lighter post than the anxiety-mare-causing AI series. 🙂

  137. Tresselt Avatar
    Tresselt
    Hide

    No! Scandinavia is Norway, Denmark and Sweden. this has a lot to do with language, historic and cultural ties, and geography. Finland is part of Fennoscandia, and along with Iceland is part of the Nordic countries (which, incidently, does not include the Baltics).

    Sorry to pick on this, but it’s a common mistake I see online, and being from Scandinavia I can confirm that no one here includes any other countries than those three I mentioned at the start. Just a heads up 🙂

    Oh, but apart from that, wonderful post!

  138. CaribbeanIce Avatar
    CaribbeanIce
    Hide

    Great post ! Is 1.65m the average height of ‘all humans alive’, or is that the worldwide average height of an adult ? If the latter you can cram in more babies and make the ‘house’ even smaller for fun !

  139. Satan's Child Avatar
    Satan’s Child
    Hide

    I’m disappointed. This post is so stupid.

  140. Anglave Avatar
    Anglave
    Hide

    After all that work, who wants to stop now while there’s still so much empty space in all of our atoms?

  141. TV Avatar
    TV
    Hide

    Putting the Jews and Muslims together in Brooklyn is the best idea anyone has ever had.

    1. sabs546 Avatar
      sabs546
      Hide

      Lol never thought of that
      Come to think of it since nobody can move it’ll just be one big argument

      1. irp Avatar
        irp
        Hide

        But that Non-Affiliated Atheism island I’d be in sounds freaking awesome!

  142. Allen Thomson Avatar
    Allen Thomson
    Hide

    The human basal metabolic rate is, if google doesn’t mislead, about 100 watts and therefore human race produces around 7.3e11 watts (730 gigawatts). So the 1 km cube containing it, with a total dissipating area of 5e6 square meters (leaving out the side on the ground), is having to get rid of some 146 kilowatts per square meter. If it did that via blackbody radiation, it would have a surface temperature of close to 1000 C, 1800 F. (Assuming i did the Stefan-Boltzmann thing right.)

    1. sabs546 Avatar
      sabs546
      Hide

      Dats one hot M&M

      1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
        DeeDee Massey
        Hide

        It would definitely melt in your hand.

    2. Jochen Kirn Avatar
      Jochen Kirn
      Hide

      Genius! Could you please work a little bit with Tim on a post or another, that would add just a little more scientific nerdiness to WBW!

      1. Jade Booth Avatar
        Jade Booth
        Hide

        yahoo google youtube and mommyish

        Read Full Article

        ◐◐◐◐◐◐◐◐◐ Get More Info GET MORE INFORMATION HERE’S

        !!!!!!s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!d

      2. Daisy Fowler Avatar
        Daisy Fowler
        Hide

        ➧➧➧➧➧➧➧ waitbutwhy Best way working online ,google yahoo,

        Read Full Article

        ➧➧➧➧➧➧➧➧ More About Now

      3. Sandra Seely Avatar
        Sandra Seely
        Hide

        ☣☣☣☣☣☣ waitbutwhy-Best way Only For Students,google yahoo,Facebook,twitter,

        Read Full Article

        ☣☣☣☣☣☣Get More Info ☛ Check Simple Task

      4. hneyjhon Avatar
        hneyjhon
        Hide

        ►➤➤♫♫With♫you♫ ♪waitbutwhy♪♪♪.-. < my roomate's mom makes $85 /hr on the internet . She has been without work for eight months but last month her paycheck was $17976 just working on the internet for a few hours.

        Try this site. GET MORE INFO

  143. Jason Kay Avatar
    Jason Kay
    Hide

    Now what would happen to earth’s orbit if everyone jumped at the same time in the blue box?
    (Assuming the floor of the building could support such a dynamic load…)

    1. Joe Avatar
      Joe
      Hide

      Not much. Average human mass = 62kg * 7.3 billion people = 5 x 10^11 kg. The earth has a mass of 6 x 10^24 kg, 13 orders of magnitude larger. This would be as if you got hit with a single cell.

      1. sabs546 Avatar
        sabs546
        Hide

        Vsauce also made a video on this
        Not much
        The earth will just fall back to where it was

    2. jebmak Avatar
      jebmak
      Hide

      xkcd covered this in one of his “what if” posts, I believe.

      1. Nigel Ng Avatar
        Nigel Ng
        Hide

        here you are: https://what-if.xkcd.com/8/

  144. DougLawrence42 Avatar

    I wanted to look at it the other way. Wikipedia says the landmass surface area for earth is 57.51 million sq miles. For 7.3 billion of us, that is 7.88 square miles each (5041 acres). Wikipedia goes on say about half of the landmass is inhabitable, so that cuts you down to 2500 acres a person, but still, WOW. A family of four gets a 10,000 acre ranch.

    1. DougLawrence42 Avatar

      OOPS! Small math error. We actually get 0.01 sq miles each (5 acres), or more like 2.5 acres if we insist on living somewhare habitable. The world just got a lot more crowded.

      1. Malthus Avatar
        Malthus
        Hide

        2.5 acres might seem like a large plot to build your house on–it’s a little shy of 2 full American Football fields–but consider that all your food, water, energy, clothing, building materials, etc. needs to come from that same 2.5 acre plot. Yes, the world is very crowded indeed.

  145. Tommy Maq Avatar
    Tommy Maq
    Hide

    “Nine Chains To The Moon” was R. B. Fuller’s illustration.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Chains_to_the_Moon

    It was his first book, and some say his best, because it was written before he gave up drinking.

  146. jaime_arg Avatar
    jaime_arg
    Hide

    Don’t use imperial units at all, that way you’ll help to accelerate the transition towards the metric system in the US. Every bit counts.

    1. jaime_arg Avatar
      jaime_arg
      Hide

      Seriously, look at how fucked up the imperial units are: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/English_mass_units_graph.svg

      1. Tommy Maq Avatar
        Tommy Maq
        Hide

        That’s no big deal:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie#mediaviewer/File:Potrzeb.jpg

    2. LondonTrader Avatar
      LondonTrader
      Hide

      On the other hand some metric users seem to have a problem with that system too. http://web.archive.org/web/20040402152919/http://www.metricsucks.com/metric_land.html

      1. jaime_arg Avatar
        jaime_arg
        Hide

        Thank you for one of the most stupid things I have superficially read in a long time.
        Please don’t waste my time again.
        Thank you.

  147. N00less Cluebie Avatar
    N00less Cluebie
    Hide

    If we start with an NYC micro-studio (http://youtu.be/JZSdrtEqcHU) at 90-square feet and what looks like 12 foot ceilings as a reference which looks like it can probably house a couple in love we get 1080 cubic feet per couple of 540 cubic feet of apartment space. Multiply that by 7.3 billion people and you end up around 4 trillion cubic feet of apartment space. Let’s assume you need at least an equal volume of common area/infrastructure (hallways, elevators, stairs, piping, ducts; support beams) and we up our requirements to 8 trillion cubic feet which nicely reduces to a building cube of around 20,000 feet each side which is serendipitously close to a cube of 6 km a side. If we limit the height of our apartment building to 1km (about 20% higher than the burj khalifa) we’ll need a square building with 14.7 km a side and a height of 1km high. In other words 216 square kilometers by 1 kilometer high or a little over the area of Manhattan plus Staten Island (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borough_%28New_York_City%29) filled completely with UBER-burj khalifs. Figuring out the parking is an exercise I leave for the reader.

    Assumptions made (if anyone wants to redo the calculations with different assumptions, be my guest)

    Minimum cubic foot studio apartment for two people: 1080 ft^3
    Factor of residential space to infrastructure space: 1-to-1
    Maximum height of apartment: 1 kilometer (3280 feet)

    Anything I missed? Any errors in my calculations?

  148. ericsp23 Avatar
    ericsp23
    Hide

    Packing all human beings down to their atomic nuclei would create an object of equivalent density to that of a neutron star. That made me curious to the volume you would have to shrink humanity down to to get a black hole (ie, to its Schwarzschild radius). Assuming that when you say humanity has a mass of 450M tonnes you mean metric tons, that would give humanity a Schwarzschild radius of 6.66×10^-16 meters, or 0.666 femtometers, or a sphere with a volume of 1.24 cubic femtometers. For reference, a femtometer is about the size of a proton, so we’re talking about compacting 7.3 billion people down to slightly larger than a proton. (It is entirely possible or even likely that I screwed up the math here so feel free to correct me if I’m wrong).

    1. Adam Avatar
      Adam
      Hide

      The M&M did get me thinking about the densities of stars… even if your maths was off by several orders of magnitude (although I’ve checked it and think it’s right), that’s still incredible to think about. The entire human population would take up about the size of a proton if it was part of a black hole. Wow.

      1. Zonnestraaltje Avatar
        Zonnestraaltje
        Hide

        sorry but to me protons can’t exist in superdensed black hole,

    2. hemen kalita Avatar
      hemen kalita
      Hide

      450M tons would be 450 million tons I think.
      450 matric ton is too small for all humans.

      1. ericsp23 Avatar
        ericsp23
        Hide

        Agreed. I used 450M as a shorthand for 450 million.

  149. shawn Avatar
    shawn
    Hide

    As someone who designs buildings for a living, I have to comment that the live load of billions of humans standing shoulder to shoulder would require some pretty significant structural consideration. The structure of each floor in your building would have to be rather substantial, and would significantly increase the height of the required building. Also you’d probably need some intermediate columns, which would take up even more space.

    And let’s not forget about the heat load created by billions of people and their filthy metabolism. Ever notice how the air conditioning in your house can struggle to keep up if you have a couple dozen people over for a party? Billions of people would warm up those spaces very quickly, so you’d better leave plenty of space for mechanical systems.

    And let’s not even get into the bathroom and egress requirements for that sort of occupant load…

    1. Tommy Maq Avatar
      Tommy Maq
      Hide

      I’ll alert Paolo Soleri that you’re ready to help out!

    2. jaime_arg Avatar
      jaime_arg
      Hide

      Also, let’s remember that it’s really hard to get 7.3 billion people in the same place, and that probably many of them would die while you’re getting them organized and new ones would be born, and that the cost of that building would be huge (who’s going to pay for it?), not to mention that it’s a sizeable amount of land it would take up (who’s going to give up that land?), and also we must consider that people will get bored so maybe we should add some TVs.
      Oh, I almost forgot that this was a hypothetical building. Disregard my reply.

      1. Tommy Maq Avatar
        Tommy Maq
        Hide

        ” it’s really hard to get 7.3 billion people in the same place, ”

        They’ve been in the same place for decades, dude.

        1. Guest Avatar
          Guest
          Hide

          ☞☞☞get $69 /hr@aa14:

          Going Here you

          Can Find Out,,

          ►►►►►► https://Up2DateCareer19.com/get2/position…

    3. d Avatar
      d
      Hide

      so the space ship that we are all going to hop on to escape the Kaboom will have some very interesting engineering challenges that maybe even the legendary Scotty won’t be equal to. Although it seems to me that it isn’t the mass that is the problem so much as the motion (i.e. life).
      But if the imaginary box is basically a tin can of humans for some peckish human eating entity, then you wouldn’t need all the fancy stuff at all, just some holes for the decomp gasses to seep through

      1. DeeDee Massey Avatar
        DeeDee Massey
        Hide

        Naw, no holes needed, just a little extra room for the pickling juice.

    4. jeffhre Avatar
      jeffhre
      Hide

      Carbon dioxide just squeezes out all the life sustaining oxygen. And sorry, there is no egress. No one outside to issue permits.

    5. Heartland Patriot Avatar
      Heartland Patriot
      Hide

      “Filthy metabolism”…let me guess, that’s everyone else and not YOU, of course. And if you do include yourself, well, that is some serious self-loathing. Maybe seek professional help with that.

      (Yes, I know the comment is VERY old but I bet there are plenty who feel exactly that way right now, maybe even that person still.)

      1. Soda Can Avatar
        Soda Can
        Hide

        ??

  150. Cookie Fonster Avatar

    “AT&T Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys, is a huge domed structure with a volume of 2.94 cubic meters. ”
    do you mean 2.94 million cubic meters?

    1. Tim Urban Avatar
      Tim Urban
      Hide

      Thanks for the correction. Fixed!

      1. jaime_arg Avatar
        jaime_arg
        Hide

        While we’re at it: “and still have room FOR the entire population of Africa”

  151. WuliNuChem Avatar
    WuliNuChem
    Hide

    Or, Noodles357, how big an apartment building where we all lived in our own apartment comfortably.

    1. Tommy Maq Avatar
      Tommy Maq
      Hide

      That all depends on what you mean by ‘comfort’ but consider this design, as long as you’re asking:

      http://www.lovolution.net/MainPages/arcology/NewOrleansArcology/edu/OldManRiver/oldManRive.htm

  152. Noodles357 Avatar
    Noodles357
    Hide

    I would love to know how big the building would need to be if we put all of these people into an office building with modern occupational standards; not just how many we could physically squeeze into a building.

    1. Tommy Maq Avatar
      Tommy Maq
      Hide

      Try this:

      http://www.lovolution.net/MainPages/arcology/NewOrleansArcology/edu/OldManRiver/oldManRive.htm

  153. Bill Warren Avatar
    Bill Warren
    Hide

    Few things I found striking…

    “You could fit all 13.9 million Jews into Central Park”
    Is that all there are? I live in NJ so it’s hard to imagine that they only make up 0.2% of the world population

    “You could squeeze all 320 million Americans into a 5.7km x 5.7km (3.5mi x 3.5mi) square”
    So (assuming he means Americans as in US Americans) Americans make up 4.4% of the world population. So only 1 in 23ish Earthicans are American.

    What really irks me is if you can fit the ENTIRE US into a small rural town center…how the f*ck is there so much traffic on my way to work?!! JFC people you have a whole god damn 3.8 MILLION square miles to live on and have to been on the same damn road as me at the same damn time!!??

    1. jaime_arg Avatar
      jaime_arg
      Hide

      Of course he means citizens of USA. America has almost a billion inhabitants. Also even I know that the population of the US of A is around 300M.

    2. Tommy Maq Avatar
      Tommy Maq
      Hide

      It’s because cars vastly increase the human profile and decrease the mean free path accordingly.

  154. fanel Avatar
    fanel
    Hide

    who likes this guy? … i do too

  155. Cory Manento Avatar
    Cory Manento
    Hide

    I would like to know what happened to Carlos when he was holding up 286 million people stacked to the moon.

    1. B_Fli Avatar
      B_Fli
      Hide

      He is now an M&M.

      1. Sylvie Avatar
        Sylvie
        Hide

        Lol!
        Also, Daniela faced with the daunting task pretended to be a boy named Daniel.

  156. Flannery Bro'Connor Avatar
    Flannery Bro’Connor
    Hide

    Have you ever read Randall Monroe’s “What If” comic? I think you would really like it.

    1. Thomas Wilson Avatar
      Thomas Wilson
      Hide

      I was thinking the same thing!

    2. Gabriel Birke Avatar
      Gabriel Birke
      Hide

      Yeah, one chapter of his book basically did the same 2-dimensional calculations and then went on to calculaate how long it would take to ship all the poeple of the earth to one place. THAT were impressive numbers!

  157. consanguinity Avatar
    consanguinity
    Hide

    OMG mind blown..